1. Bartels RH, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis:case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1):E194. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000163419.59635.78
2. Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, et al. Intermediate clinical andradiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years offollow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(6):841-850. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6
3. Bridwell KH, Anderson PA, Boden SD, Vaccaro AR, Zigler JE.What's new in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(7):1587-1596. doi:10.2106/00004623-200407000-00033
4. Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Raimondi MT, Fornari M, Assietti R.Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a discprosthesis. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30(9):1127-1133. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.02.002
5. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience withthe Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(3):840-847. doi:10.1227/00006123-200209000-00048
6. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH.Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the siteof a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1999;81(4):519-528. doi:10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009
7. Kolstad F, Nygaard ØP, Leivseth G. Segmental motion adjacent toanterior cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa1976). 2007;32(5):512-517. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000256448.04035.bb
8. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al. Heterotopic ossificationin total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2006;31(24):2802-2806. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5
9. Parkinson JF, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicatedby delayed spontaneous fusion. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine.2005;2(3):377-380. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.2.3.0377
10. Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC.Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignmentof the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of thecervical spine. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(1):20-29. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0459-y.
11. Wenger M, Hoonacker Pv, Zachee B, Lange R, Markwalder TM.Bryan cervical disc prostheses: preservation of function over time. JClin Neurosci. 2009;16(2):220-225. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2008.01.021
12. Yang S, Wu X, Hu Y, et al. Early and intermediate follow-up resultsafter treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervicaldisc prosthesis: single- and multiple-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2008;33(12):E371-E377. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817343a6
13. Jiang Y, Tian Y, Wang YP, Qiu GX, Weng XS, Feng B. The mid-termeffects of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis on sagittal alignment ofoverall cervical spine and the functional spinal unit. Zhonghua WaiKe Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;50(3):243-6.
14. Ryu WH, Kowalczyk I, Duggal N. Long-term kinematic analysisof cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervicaldisc prosthesis. Spine J. 2013;13(6):628-634. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.046
15. Li JY, Jia YS, Zheng CY, et al. Effect of Bryan cervical disc replacementon cervical curvature and replacement segment in treating cervicalspondylosis. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018;31(8):751-756. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.08.013
16. Shin JJ, Kim KR, Son DW, et al. Radiological changes in adjacentand index levels after cervical disc arthroplasty. Yonsei Med J.2022;63(1):72-81. doi:10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.72
17. Patwardhan AG, Havey RM. Biomechanics of cervical discarthroplasty-a review of concepts and current technology. Int J SpineSurg. 2020;14(s2):S14-S28. doi:10.14444/7087
18. Wo J, Lv Z, Wang J, et al. Biomechanical analysis of cervical artificialdisc replacement using cervical subtotal discectomy prosthesis. FrontBioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:680769. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.680769
19. Patwardhan AG, Havey RM. Prosthesis design influences segmentalcontribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2713-2721. doi:10.1007/s00586-019-06064-4